The world in chaos

The Ukraine war has been ongoing since February 2022, while there seems to be no end to the Gaza war since October 2023 despite Israel having achieved none of its objectives for going to war in Gaza.
All these have put the world in chaos for the past two years with no end in sight for the peaceful resolution of both wars.
While it is Russia that is on the receiving end in the Ukraine war in the sense of having to confront Russophobia in the western world, and the hostile intention of its strategic defeat and its dismemberment by the west particularly the US, not to mention the hybrid sanctions war which Russia had already won, in the Gaza war it is the Palestinians and the Lebanese whose territories were occupied by the Zionist regime for decades that are on the receiving end.
Both the Palestinians and the Lebanese are in an existential battle with the so-called mighty and genocidal Israeli military, supported by the equally mighty and genocidal US and its European allies in providing the weapons of mass genocide to Israel.
But despite these one-sided wars where strength and power are on the side of the US and its western allies aka the collective west, they were unable to inflict a decisive strategic defeat of Russia in the Ukraine war, while in the Gaza war Israel seems powerless to annihilate Hamas or sending Lebanon back to the Stone Age despite overwhelming support from the genocidal regimes of the collective west.
Like in a situation of what goes around comes around, it is now the turn of the US and its western allies together with Ukraine and Israel that are facing a sort of a microcosm of the world in chaos in their body politics.
Let’s start with the US first but before that as your editor is writing these lines, there comes news fresh from the oven in which British prime minister Rishi Sunak has kept his seat, but the Conservative Party he led has suffered a historic loss in the British general election today (July 5).
“The Labour Party has won this general election… the British people have delivered a sobering verdict tonight,” Sunak said in a speech lasting less than two minutes on Friday morning, as exit polls and early results projected the opposition had won more than 400 out of 650 seats in parliament.
Just like his predecessor Liz Truss, these two unelected British PM had succumbed to the Zelensky’s curse of losing their coveted premiership for being a staunch supporter of Project Ukraine, and in the case of Sunak, Project Gaza as well.

It does not bode well for democracy when an unelected PM has a lot of say and clout in leading the direction a country should take without due regards to what the electorate thinks, as seen in Sunak’s obstinate refusal to change policy direction in supporting the genocide of the Palestinians despite months of massive weekly protests against his government’s support for Israel.
Perhaps the Constitution should be amended to limit the reign of an unelected PM to only six months before more damages to the country are done.
It is indeed good riddance for the British electorate with the departure of Sunak.
Like Sunak, the new UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a well-known staunch supporter of Ukraine and Israel. It is reassuring that in his victory speech he pledged “national renewal” following 14 years of Conservative rule.
“Change begin now … we have to return politics to public service, show that politics can be a force for good. Make no mistake, that is the great test for politics in this era. The fight for trust is the battle that defines our age,” he said.
Let’s give him the benefit of the doubt and see whether there are any meaningful changes in his administration otherwise he will be the fourth British candidate of the Zelensky’s curse following in the footsteps of Boris Johnson, Truss and Sunak.
Let’s now come back to the US in which the Democrats went into a tailspin of turmoil following the debacle of president Joe Biden’s lacklustre debate performance, where in the words of journalist Adam Gabbatt of the Guardian, ‘the president spent much of his 90 minutes on stage staring into the middle distance, mouth agape, like a drunk reading the menu board in a kebab shop’ and ‘when Biden did speak, his voice was shaky, and he appeared to lose his train of thought at times.’
This led to anxiety among the Democrats which in turn led to calls which have now snowballed into a sort of a ‘no-confidence vote’ against Biden as the Democratic nominee for the presidential election this November, with major Democratic donors weighing in on his future and key sponsors are looking at ways of replacing him.
This has also led to a sort of unity rarely seen between Democrats and Republicans in wanting Biden out of the race, with House Speaker Mike Johnson who’s a Republican urging for Biden not just to withdraw from the race, but also be immediately removed from office, as he is ‘not up to the task’ and will put the country in a ‘very dangerous situation’.
For many Americans, Biden has just squandered his chance to prove he has the vitality, vigour and suitability for a second term in the White House, with a debate performance which only underlined concerns that he is too old for the job.
Just as people were processing the debate debacle,the US supreme court announced that presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for almost anything they do in office.
It threw Trump’s recent conviction, and his other court cases, into a limbo which demolishes the last wall allegedly built by the Democrats to prevent Trump from becoming the Republican nominee at the last minute that will throw the Republicans into a turmoil.
This wall was built because deep in their hearts the Democrats believe that Trump will “trump” Biden in a fair election that is not politically motivated to disqualify him as the Republican nominee.
It is instead the Democrats that are now in a state of turmoil due not to the Republican’s doing but Biden’s own doing for being too incoherent and pathetic during the debate.

Trump was initially set to be sentenced on July 11, after he was found guilty on 34 charges of falsifying business records to hide hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels.
But after that supreme court decision, his sentencing has been pushed back to September 18, as the judge in the case decides whether Trump has immunity that could abort the conviction.
In fact the urgency to replace Biden gained momentum after the supreme court decision.
This is because Trump has also opened up a lead over Biden among young voters, according to an AtlasIntel poll, and this latest development is very concerning to the Democrats.
Trump leads Biden by 15 points among 18-to-29-year-olds, according to the survey conducted by one of the most accurate pollsters in the 2020 election.
The younger voters are a force to be reckoned with, judging by the massive protests of university students all over US against the genocidal American support for Israel in the Gaza war which have alienated many in the Democrats’ base of strong supporters.
The survey was conducted between June 26 and 28, which means some people were polled after the debate. A smattering of other polls paint a mixed picture – some show support for Biden falling since the debate, others show him more or less holding steady.
To underscore the urgency of Biden must be replaced, on July 2, Reuters reported there are 25 Democratic members of the House of Representatives ready to call for Biden to step down if he continues to look shaky, and two Democratic Congress members – both in swing districts – have said they believe Biden will lose to Trump in November.
Prominent news organisations, including the New York Times, have called for Biden to be replaced, as have numerous pundits.
The following day (July 3) a report in the New York Times added fuel to the fire by claiming that Biden told a close ally he is wondering whether or not to stay in the election race.
As part of the scramble to undo the damage in the last 48 hours, Biden has phoned top Democrats in Congress, including House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Jim Clyburn (South Carolina), and Senator Chris Coons (Delaware), to clear the issue, according to Politico.
He reportedly met in private with over 20 Democratic governors on the evening of July 3 to tell them he underwent a medical checkup after the debate and is fine.
But unfortunately for Biden that medical check-up did not involve major tests to determine his suitability as an election candidate that is too old, and the governors want him to do major medical tests, perhaps for dementia or Parkinson’s disease as a proof that he is fit for office.
Also, it didn’t help that during that meeting aimed at bolstering support for his campaign, Biden reportedly made the admission he needs to get more sleep and work less.

It is ludicrous to hear that the head of state of a country which is the sole hegemon in a unipolar world prefers sleep over work which is a sure proof he is intimidated by the huge responsibility that his office demands because of old age.
But despite all these, Biden proved to be indefatigable especially after gaining support from his family who wanted him to continue running for the presidency.
In a Zoom call with campaign and Democratic National Committee staff, he said: “Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can – as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running … no one’s pushing me out. I’m not leaving. I’m in this race to the end and we’re going to win,” Politico cited Biden as saying during the call.
Senator Chris Coons, after speaking with Biden on Tuesday, said that the president was “determined to beat Donald Trump.”
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre rushed to tell reporters that Biden “is clear-eyed and he is staying in the race.”
But pressure is growing exponentially, with dozens of Democratic lawmakers reportedly mulling signing a letter demanding that Biden withdraw from the race, according to an unnamed senior party official.
According to this official, Democrats fear association with the unpopular and apparently senile president will harm their own re-election chances in November, leading to “a Republican sweep of Washington and an unchecked Donald Trump presidency.”
Trump has repeatedly said what he will do in a second term – subject Liz Cheney, one of the few Republicans who is critical of him, to a “televised military tribunal” on uncertain charges, and has also said he will act as a dictator on “day one” of his presidency.
Meanwhile, liberal pundits have gone further, with The Atlantic and The Hill both publishing op-eds on Wednesday calling on Biden to leave office immediately, after the New York Times, Washington Post, and Chicago Tribune all called on him to step aside so the party can choose a more lucid candidate to take on Trump this November.
According to multiple polls, Americans have already decided that Biden is not fit for office when a survey conducted by CBS News/YouGov in the wake of the debate found that 72% of registered voters do not believe that Biden has the “mental and cognitive health necessary to serve as president.”
But despite all these, White House staffers are still in a denial mode with press secretary Jean-Pierre saying “we really want to turn the page on this”, adding that Biden’s upcoming appearances will allow Americans to “see him for themselves.”
Some senior Democratic strategists were quoted by the Washington Post as warning that these alleged efforts could prove too little, too late to reverse the negative trend in public and internal polling alike.

Citing unnamed sources, the Washington Post said Biden campaign had long operated on the assumption that enough voters would vote against Trump, making Biden their candidate of choice by default.
However, some strategists within the Democratic Party are reportedly unsure that this is necessarily a given.
Biden “giving two four-minute statements and reading a teleprompter at a rally and a fundraiser” is not going to be enough to restore shaken confidence among voters, one source said.
In the latest report on the issue today (July 5), Biden’s incoherent raving and ranting are there for all to see when he made several radio interview appearances and delivered a brief Fourth of July speech.
In an interview with Philadelphia’s WURD, Biden said he is proud to be a black woman. (See https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1808974408494821730).
“By the way, I’m proud to be, as I said, the first vice president, first black woman… to serve with a black president. Proud to be involved of the first black woman on the Supreme Court. There’s so much that we can do because, look… we’re the United States of America.”
The US president also delivered a four-minute speech at the White House, focusing his remarks on his visit last month to Normandy, to commemorate the 80th anniversary of D-Day, but seemingly veered off script and lost the train of thought several times, and at one point even called his rival Trump a “colleague.” (See https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1808990157086830889).
“And by the way, you know I was in that WWI cemetery in France, and…. the one that one of our colleagues, the former president, did not wanna go and be up there… I shouldn’t probably have said it anyway,” Biden said before abruptly cutting the story short, and continuing his prepared remarks.
In another clip scrutinized and mocked by critics, Biden greeted the crowd with a lively “Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Independence Day!”, after Vice President Kamala Harris almost accidentally introduced him as the vice president. (See https://x.com/DogRightGirl/status/1809027478360383856)
But the big question in your editor’s opinion is this with one more debate with Trump being lined up on September 10, can Biden miraculously do away with that gait on stage of staring into the middle distance, mouth agape, like a drunk reading the menu board in a kebab shop and speaking incoherently with a shaky voice and losing his train of thoughts? Most likely not.
Meanwhile Biden is facing grim ultimatum to bow out from the race. Charles Myers, the chair of Signum Global Advisors who is a major Democratic Party donor believes Biden’s disastrous debate performance has changed the race “fundamentally” and caused “panic” – not only among Democratic Party donors but office holders.

House and Senate Democrats in particular fear the president’s weak showing will drag down their campaigns, and prominent figures are expected to publicly call on Biden to step aside in favour of another candidate, Myers told Bloomberg Surveillance.
“I’m hearing the most pressure and much more panic [from elected Democrats] actually than amongst the donors,” he added.
The Biden campaign has just a few days to demonstrate the president is up to the job amid mounting concern over his physical and mental condition.
“I think we’re going to find out in the next four to five days whether the president is still in this race. I don’t think he’s got three weeks,” Myers stated.
Another major Democratic donor and Disney family heir Abigail Disney announced on Thursday (July 4) that she would halt donations unless Biden steps down from the presidential elections race.”
“This is realism, not disrespect,” Disney told CNBC, stating, “if Biden does not step down, the Democrats will lose. Of that I am absolutely certain. The consequences for the loss will be genuinely dire.”
Tensions increased between Biden’s campaign manager and their funders during a second donor call that was composed of only the top 40 donors, who raised the question of whether the campaign would offer a refund should Biden withdraw from the race, according to Reuters and the Associated Press.
Some donors have followed Disney’s lead of ceasing funds unless Biden is replaced in the presidential race.
“When a country is not behaving how we want them to, we apply harsh economic sanctions. It’s a give and take – short-term hurt for long-term healing,” screenwriter and significant contributor Damon Lindelof wrote in Deadline, proposing a “DEMbargo”.
Co-founder of Netflix and major donor, Reed Hastings, and his wife, Patty Quillin, joined their fellow funders in calling for Biden to step down from the presidential race.
According to The New York Times, the couple has donated more than $20 million to the Democratic party, including $1.5 million for Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign.
“Virtually every major donor I’ve talked to believes that we need a new candidate in order to defeat Donald Trump,” philanthropist Gideon Stein said to CNBC, withholding his planned $3 million donations.
In your editor’s opinion this matter can be easily resolved by appointing a panel of three physicians to do a thorough medical examination on Biden to determine whether he suffers from mental sickness in old age.
This panel should comprise the best dementia experts in the Democratic and Republican parties, and headed by the best dementia expert in the country.
If this issue of Biden’s mental state is not resolved, then if he is really suffering from some kind of mental health, the big question will be who is really running his administration.

No wonder US foreign policies of late bear the hallmark of a schizophrenic policies. To quote a few examples:
a) Having officially said that the US has put enormous pressure on Israel not to go for an all-out war with Hezbollah because US military personnel will be endangered, and therefore it is trying its best to prevent this escalation, in the same breadth the US is on record to have said should such a war occur it will without any hesitation support Israel.
b) After saying that the US will impose an arms embargo on Israel if it went ahead with the Rafah invasion, the US continues to deliver weapons of mass genocide to Israel when the latter went ahead with the invasion.
c) Despite umpteenth time the US said it is not at war with Russia, it continues to supply Ukraine with weaponries and ammunitions and give Ukraine its blessing for Kiev to use long range ATACMS that the US has supplied for it to commit terrorist acts deep inside Russia, in which a US RQ-4 Global Hawk long range surveillance drone was used to direct the missiles that were going to Crimea.
All these examples bore the hallmark of a schizophrenic and demented presidency where decision makings are actually made by the minions of an incapacitated president – Tony Blinken on foreign policies, Llyod Austin on military affairs, Jake Sullivan on national security and Victoria Nuland on project Ukraine.
In previous presidency these peoples were supposed to give advice and not to make decisions because when it comes to decision the buck stops at the president, period!

President Emmanuel Macron of France is a practising politician with a lousy political insight and analysis.
Instead of looking inward at both his domestic and foreign policies that could be the cause of his Renaissance Party (RE) getting a drubbing from Marine Le Pen’s right wing National Rally (RN) at last month European Parliament Election, his bourgeois arrogance refuses to see the possibility of his policies that are at fault.
Instead he is so bunkum enough that he decided to gamble by calling a snap election in France itself, thinking that he can drub the RN in a sort of tit-for-tat to salvage his political reputation, and perhaps his political survival.
He forgot the fact that the RN, although failing to form the government in every parliamentary elections and capturing the presidency in every presidential elections, has been growing from strength to strength at every elections.
And so to his horror, the results of the first round of parliamentary election last Sunday (June 30) saw his centrist Ensemble bloc which includes the RE getting yet another drubbing, again from the RN, to earn a third place, not even a second place with RN in the first.
Now to ensure that the RN would not get the majority in Parliament so that it won’t form the government, he has worked around the loophole of asking both the centrist and leftist parties to withdraw their candidacies in some constituencies (more than 200) for the second run-off this Sunday (July 7).
The idea behind this is with a one-to-one contest with the RN instead of a multi-cornered contest, the votes for the leftist and centrist would not be split in each constituency, which will contribute to the defeat of RN candidates, resulting in the failure of RN to get the majority to form the government.
France’s parliamentary election is a bit complicated. It takes place every five years, utilising a two-round voting system to elect a total of 577 MPs who will form the National Assembly, the lower house of the French parliament.
In the first round of the elections, only 79 seats are up for grab. The RN and its allies won a total of 37 seats in the first round, coming in first.
In the second round, the remaining 501 seats will be contested. RN needs to win a total of 289 seats in order to secure an absolute majority.
With 37 seats in their pockets, the RN and its allies only need to secure 252 seats in the second round in order to obtain the majority needed to form the government, while the centrists and leftists each needs more than 252 seats to form a government on their own.
It is on the basis of this calculus that experts were predicting the likely outcome of the first far right prime minister in France and were wondering whether Macron has the courage to appoint such a PM in the event the RN wins.

Now this impotent act of Macron urging for a massive withdrawal of candidates akin to a withdrawal symptom has thrown a spanner in the works.
Some see this as a strategic move of Macron just like his strategic ambiguity blunder of sending French troops to Ukraine which actually could be the cause of the drubbing his party received from the RN at the European Parliament elections and the first round of the French parliamentary elections.
But most analysts see this withdrawal of candidacies as not a strategic move but a tactical one that could backfire and rebound on his face.
The best case scenario for this tactical move is a hung parliament that is detrimental to the interest of the nation as legislation will get stuck making France an ungovernable country because of political paralysis.
The worst case scenario will again be a humiliating drubbing of Macron’s party when voters, fed-up with Macron’s antics, will vote in droves for the RN despite his tactical ploy.
Macron is blind in failing to see that advocating for a European or French troops to be sent to Ukraine has made him a war-mongering president in the eyes of European and French voters.
Who needs a war mongering president when due to the support for Ukraine, the armouries of the French military had been almost emptied out, leaving it vulnerable with the bare minimum to alone defend itself from any aggression from any country.
That is the reason why under Macron, France had to humiliatingly exit Africa, its once colonial outpost that had given France access to rich mineral resources and military bases.
France knows it will lose if it ever embarks on either an overt war with the African regimes it once colonialised or even a covert, hybrid war based on regime change. The case of Niger is very illustrative on this.
Most European leaders had “condemned” Macron’s idea of sending boots on the ground in Ukraine including even the US and Nato, as this could result in a direct war between Russia and Nato, sparking a world war three.
Even Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany who consoles Macron every day since the drubbing Macron received from RN by sending daily messages of encouragement to him, and that the pair ‘discuss the situation which is indeed quite disheartening’, was not keen on the idea of sending European troops in Ukraine.
Under attack from all sides, Macron hides behind the convoluted stance of strategic ambiguity in which he assured the French and European people that he does not intend to send French troops to Ukraine for now but still holds the option of doing so on the table so that this ambiguity will force the Russians to always be on their toes with regard to defeating Ukraine.

This is despite the Russians making it very clear its strategic unambiguity policy of treating any French or European military personnel in Ukraine as legitimate target of attack, and is proven by deeds when a big number of French military personnel in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries or advisors were liquidated through missile bombings.
The fact that his party was drubbed hollow in elections is a proof that the French and European electorates see him for what he is – a war mongering president.
So France would be in the long haul political paralysis if the best case scenario of Macron’s tactical move becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. That seems to be the likely outcome as the votes are being counted today (July 8).
This is the first time in the history of France where despite the leftist and centrist are in bed together for a marriage of convenience since they loathe so much the far right RN, but at the same time they loathe each other too.
The tactical ploy of depriving the RN from forming the government was conceived by Macron in which he urged the leader of the leftist coalition, the New Popular Front (NFP), Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the France Unbowed party to support the ploy.
Mélenchon did so on the understanding that the leftist and centrist should form a coalition government together if the ploy works.
But Macron is reported to have said that his centrist coalition will govern alone if they win. This has irked Mélenchon who is determined to do the same if the NFP wins.
What this means is that there’s no way any of the three contending coalitions on their own could obtain an outright majority to form a government whatever their position in the second round of the elections.
This will put France in a very severe political paralysis where the Constitution does not allow a general election to be held for a year after the previous election.
So under this best case scenario one can make the case that Macron’s gambit of withdrawing candidates in large numbers has resulted in the failure of the RN to form the government which makes him a practising politician with good political insight and analysis after all.
However one can also convincingly make the case of him as a lousy politician because by calling a snap election, his party loses the majority that it had which will only make it difficult for him to govern France effectively.
Remember he called these surprise snap elections, in his own words, to provide France with ‘clarification’ in the wake of his party’s defeat in the European parliament. But the country now looks even further away from that now.

And the fact is his party still gets a drubbing, this time from the leftist coalition.
The far right RN is well-known for its anti-immigration and xenophobic stance.
But most analysts are saying that even without the RN in government, France under Macron had already implemented far right policies in matters of security and immigration.
In fact what is seldom analysed is that this xenophobic and anti-immigration stance of the far right arises due to the policies of the leftist and centrist in power supporting the US for decades in their forever wars of regime change in the Middle East and Africa in order to stay as the hegemon of the unipolar world.
If there is no such “engineered” regime change wars, these countries will experience political stability which means there is no reason for the people to emigrate to Europe or the US, apart from the normal brain drain, an economic phenomenon which in the main is people just wanting to seek greener pastures elsewhere.
As any country will always, at some point in time, need migrant workers for their economic development, this can be handled judiciously with the right and appropriate mix of enlightened policies.
This is where things are getting chaotic in Europe.
There are just no differences in policy stances among the leftist, rightist and centrist.
All coalesce with the same policies of anti-immigration, xenophobia, support for Ukraine and Zionism.
Look at Britain, what do the former PM Rishi Sunak and the new PM Keir Stammer have in common?
It’s support for Ukraine and Israel, not just ordinary support but staunch support, and yet one is a rightist and conservative, and the other is a leftist and liberal.
Actually it is the Americans who has been leading this dichotomy for decades.
We could rightly ask the same question on the difference between the rightist, conservative and republican George W Bush and the leftist, liberal and democratic Barack Obama; between Obama and the rightist conservative and republican Donald Trump; and between Trump and the leftist, liberal and democratic Joe Biden.
We will get the same answer of “not much”, judging from their penchant for regime change, forever wars and unilateral sanctions.
We are now living in interesting and critical time were we see that in the collective west the far right, the rightist, the far centrist, the centrist, the far left and the leftist are all coalescing into a phenomenon of which, for a lack of a better term, I would say unity in diversity in their policies.
But because they are fundamentally of differing ideologies, a time will come when these contradictory ideologies coalescing into a movement towards unity in policies will reach a critical mass that will just end up in a rapture.
This movement towards coalescing to a unity of policies has been happening since the time of George W Bush more than 20 years ago which is a long time already.
So the rupture will come in due course, and when it occurs, we can only hope and pray that it will be in a peaceful way akin to the dissolution of the Soviet Empire which disintegrated in a peaceful way much to everyone’s surprise.

Read more on the chaos and turmoil in the US and European body politics especially in America, France, Britain, Germany and Ukraine, along with the chaos in Israel:

Mega-Donors Cut Off Biden, Prepare PACs To Fund ‘Mini-Primary’ And New Candidate

CURRENT WORLD EVENTS–UPDATES & ADDITIONS

MEDIA GASLIGHTING ON BIDEN AND UKRAINE; PLUS, BELATED SPIEF 2024 VIDEO

WHAT RUSSIANS DIDN’T MISS — BIDEN BEAT TRUMP IN THE SPINACH DEBATE

Biden interview triggers radio host’s exit

‘Everything I do’ is a cognitive test – Biden

Biden campaign fed questions for ‘I’m a black woman’ interview

President Biden goes on incredibly confusing rant, calls himself the first black woman to serve with a black president

European leaders ‘stunned’ by Biden’s accelerated aging – WaPo

Biden refuses to believe poll numbers

Top Democrat donor calls for Biden withdrawal

Biden wants ‘more sleep’ and ‘less work’ – NYT

US Democratic donors urge Biden to step aside – WaPo

Biden vows to beat Trump ‘again in 2020’

Biden should be removed as president – US House speaker

Major Democratic donors weighing Biden’s future – NYT

America doesn’t have a president – Musk

Biden campaign’s future hinges on his wife – NBC

Nikki Haley urges Republicans to prepare for Biden’s replacement

Biden faces growing doubts from Democrats about his 2024 re-election

New US govt official quits citing Biden’s ‘funding and enabling’ of Gaza genocide

UK Labour Party loses parliament seats to pro-Palestine candidates

British Tory party loses all seats in Wales

Corbyn triumphs over former party in UK election

Farage ‘coming for Labour’ after ‘the end’ of the Tories

New British PM assures Ukraine of ‘unshakable’ support

G7 expresses ‘full solidarity and support to Israel’

Sunak says UK participated in defending ‘Israel’

Trump wants Biden to stay in race – WaPo

The US president is now officially a wizard-king

The curious case of Donald Trump: Is polling a useless predictor of outcome?

A US presidential election unlike all others — Jamari Mohtar

Le Pen’s party falls short of historic milestone in French election

‘Putin endorsed Le Pen’: Russiagate comes to France

French election results trigger riots (VIDEOS)

‘Elements in West’ want World War III – NATO member state

NATO fears French withdrawal – media

Le Pen pledges to block troop deployment to Ukraine

National Rally set for historic election victory in France – exit poll

French far right obliterates Macron’s party in EU election

Germany’s Scholz says he consoles Macron ‘every day’

0% of Germans ‘very satisfied’ with government – poll

Elections in the West are masking an irreversible hidden process

WEST STILL GRASPING AT STRAWS AS UKRAINE’S MILITARY SITUATION BECOMES MORE DIRE

Tucker Carlson on US-Russia After Putin Interview

US warships barely keep up with Yemeni attacks: Navy commander

Arab League drops Hezbollah ‘terrorist’ designation

Israel faces ‘obliterating war’ if it expands aggression on Lebanon: Iran

June 7, 2023: Israel defence minister threatens to send Lebanon back to Stone Age

Aug 8, 2023: Gallant: Israel ‘will return Lebanon to Stone Age’ if Hezbollah makes a mistake

Aug 15, 2023: Hezbollah responds to Israeli threat: You too will go back to Stone Age

June 27,2024: Defense Minister Gallant chickens out, says Israel Could Return Lebanon To The Stone Age, But Doesn’t Want War With Hezbollah

Israel Purchases AI Systems to Counter ‘Clear Loss’ on Digital Battlefield – Haaretz

Regards,

Jamari Mohtar

Editor, Let’s Talk!

P.S: Read our op-eds published by several news portals about the regional war in the Middle East, the end of the US Empire, the latest in the Ukraine war, the on-going Hamas-Israel war, unprecedented Hamas attack on Israel, Nagorno-Karabakh, Brics-11, the sanctions war imposed on Russia, the Black Sea Grain Initiative and China & Russia as peacemakers in the Middle East:

Gaza war has dire economic cost for Israel

Regional war in the Middle East

2024 – Tectonic geopolitical change that will upend US empire

The year America failed to predict the unexpected

In 2023, the US fails to expect the unexpected

An ‘unexpected’ hardening of Russia’s stance

Hamas-Israel war spotlights Palestine sovereignty

Don’t underestimate the Muslim-Arab group working for a ceasefire via diplomacy

US, Israel may be on verge of defeat in war of attrition

The Plan For Israel To Supply Natural Gas To Europe

Israel’s plan to supply gas to Europe

The plan for Israel to supply natural gas to Europe